01. Walkowski, S. and Szymas, J. (2011). Quality evaluation of virtual slides using methods based on comparing common image areas. Diagn Pathol, 6 (Suppl 1), S14. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-S1-S14

02. Kalinski, T., Zwönitzer, R., Grabellus, F., Sheu, S.-Y., Sel, S., Hofmann, H., . . . Roessner, A. (2009). Lossy compression in diagnostic virtual 3-dimensional microscopy—where is the limit? Hum Pathol, 40(7), 998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.12.010

03. Farahani N et al. Whole slide imaging in pathology: advantages, limitations, and emerging perspectives. Pathology and Laboratory Medicine International. 2015. 7: 23-33.

04. Pantanowitz L et al. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. J Pathol Inform. 2011. 2: 36.


06. Karim N. Lecture: Conference Chair’s Opening Address. Digital Pathology Congress: Asia. Global Engage. Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. 2016: 22-23 August.

07. Weinstein, R. S. (1986). Prospects for telepathology. Hum Pathol, 17(5), 433-434. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(86)80028-4

08. Weinstein, R. S., Bloom, K. J. and Rozek, L. S. (1987). Telepathology and the Networking of Pathology Diagnostic services. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 111, 646-652.

09. Griffin J and Treanor D. (2017). Digital Pathology in Clinical Use: where are we now and what is holding us back? Histopathology, 70:134-145.

10. Isaacs, M., Lennerz, J. K., Yates, S., Clermont, W., Rossi, J. and Pfeifer, J. D. (2011). Implementation of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology: A value added approach. J Pathol Inform, 2, 39. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.84232

11. Murray M. Laboratory Information Management Systems.

12. Mitchell B. Bandwidth. 22 May 2015

13. University Health Service, University of Michigan. Computer Ergonomics: How to Protect Yourself from Strain and Pain.


15. Silver R. Pixel. December 2014

16. DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 26, Pathology. DICOM Supplement 145: Whole Slide Microscopic Image IOD and SOP Classes. Virgina USA. 24 August 2010. 

17. Pinco, J., Goulart, R. A., Otis, C. N., Garb, J. and Pantanowitz, L. (2009). Impact of digital image manipulation in cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 133(1), 57-61. doi: 10.1043/1543-2165-133.1.57

18. Parker M. Barcodes Explained.

19. Snyder et al. Patient misidentifications caused by errors in standard bar code technology. Clin Chem. 2010. 56(10): 1554-1560.

20. Thorstenson S et al. Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: Digital pathology experiences 2006-2013. J Pathol Inform. 2014. 5: 15

21. Foran, D., Meer, P., Papthomas T.,Marsic, I. Compression Guidelines for Diagnostic Telepathology. Accessed from

22. Krupinski EA, Johnson JP, Jaw S, Graham AR, Weinstein RS. Compressing pathology whole-slide images using a human and model observer evaluation. J Pathol Inform [serial online] 2012 [cited 2017 Apr 14];3:17. Available from:

23. Cornish T. Lecture: Selection and Implementation of a Digital Pathology System. Pathology Informatics Summit 2016, May 23-26. Wyndham Hotel Pittsburgh PA. 2016: May 23.


25. Digital Pathology Association. Archival and Retrieval in Digital Pathology Systems. Retrieved from On April 4 2017.

26. RCPAQAP. Instructions for viewing Virtual Microscope Images.pdf. RCPA Quality Assurance Programs. NSW. Australia.

27. Wilson T. How Streaming Video and Audio Work.

28. Bidgood WD Jr et al. Understanding and Using DICOM, the Data Interchange Standard for Biomedical Imaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 May-Jun; 4(3): 199–212.

29. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine. Rosslyn VA.

Copyright © 2019 RCPA. All rights reserved.

Website design and development by Big Blue Digital.